• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
CAD4Security

CAD4Security

CAD4Security

  • Home
  • Contests
  • Technical Events
  • Outreach
  • CAD Tools
  • SoC Vulnerability Database
  • Trainings
  • News
  • Special Calls
  • Sponsors
  • Call For Contributions

SoC Vulnerability #6

You are here: Home / SoC Vulnerability Database / SoC Vulnerability #6

The domain of Attacks

Software
Hardware


Attack Model

CAPEC-233: Privilege Escalation 

CWE-ID: – 1262

Illegal Physical Memory Protection (PMP) unit access after mismatch


Threat Model – Privilege Escalation

Soc Vul. #Name of CoreSecurity RequirementThreat model descriptionEffectSW attack model
6CVA6 RISC-V CPU If there is any address mismatch during address translation for the physical memory locations, access should only be given in the highest privilege mode (M mode)Privilege Escalation: Illegal access is given to lower privilege modesIllegal memory page access from user privilege level Software in the guest OS can access memory page without having the proper privilege permission.  
Possible attacks: Access control, Illegal interrupt, information leakage etc 
Table 1. Attack model description

Description

In a system-on-chip (SoC), the software will commonly access the peripherals through a memory-mapped register interface. Thus, the software can access only certain registers with respect to their privilege level hardcoded in the design. However, through the accessible register interface, malicious software could tamper with the hardware data. The physical memory protection (PMP) unit takes care of the address translation for the physical memory locations inside the processor. If there is any mismatch during this process, no physical memory access is given to the lower privilege levels. However, this vulnerability can enable an attacker to gain the memory access even with lower privilege levels ( S mode and U mode).


Security Property

property pmp;
            @(posedge clk_i) disable iff (!rst_ni) (ariane.ex_stage_i.lsu_i.i_mmu.i_pmp_if.priv_lvl_i == riscv::PRIV_LVL_S) |-> (ariane.ex_stage_i.lsu_i.i_mmu.i_pmp_if.allow_o !=1);
endproperty
            ap_vulnerability126: assert property (pmp);
Table 2. Assertions/properties to check privilege escalation in RISC-V design.

Procedure

  1. Invoke Cadence JG inside the cva6_master folder
  2. Run the prove_t1.tcl script to check the assertion.  
  3. Violation in the assertion will generate CEX.   
download files

Impact of Vulnerability

Loss of confidentiality and integrity of the SoC


Severity

TBA (Metrics to evaluate the vulnerability impact)


tools used

Cadence JasperGold

Results (counter-example)

Fig.1 shows that the property (ref. Table.2) violates the RISC-V design, indicating the illegal physical memory location access (privilege violation) in the generated CEX (shown in Fig.2).  

Fig 1
Fig 2
previous arrow
next arrow
previous arrow
Fig 1
Fig 2
next arrow
 
Shadow

CAD4Security

Navigation

EVENTS
CAD TOOLS
SPECIAL CALLS
CONTACT US




Copyright © 2022